Showing posts with label muslim. Show all posts
Showing posts with label muslim. Show all posts

Thursday, August 19, 2010

Oh-Oh, One Out of Five Americans Think Obama is a Muslim



You will recall during the campaign, Team Obama was doing any and every thing to dispel the notion that The Won was a Muslim. They were quite effective at squashing the notion.  However, since getting into office, the notion of Obama being a Muslim is starting to take root.

In a new Pew Research Poll, the number of Americans who think Obama is a Muslim is now on the rise.  
A substantial and growing number of Americans say that Barack Obama is a Muslim, while the proportion saying he is a Christian has declined. More than a year and a half into his presidency, a plurality of the public says they do not know what religion Obama follows.
A new national survey by the Pew Research Center finds that nearly one-in-five Americans (18%) now say Obama is a Muslim, up from 11% in March 2009. Only about one-third of adults (34%) say Obama is a Christian, down sharply from 48% in 2009. Fully 43% say they do not know what Obama’s religion is. The survey was completed in early August, before Obama’s recent comments about the proposed construction of a mosque near the site of the former World Trade Center.  [MORE] 
Of course many on the left are saying these numbers reflect the effectiveness of the Right Wing Smear Machine.  I say nonsense. Obama himself has fueled these numbers with his own actions by showing more than just a little deference to the Muslim world.  For example:

These are just a few examples. The Right Wing Smear Machine did not make them up. Obama himself chose to do all of these things and each feeds into the idea that he is a Muslim.

Despite continually bending over backwards for the Muslim world, it appears that Obama has gained diddle squat for it from Muslims. In the very same poll, Pew Research finds that among the various religious groups, Obama gets the smallest approval from Muslims.

With results like that, one has to wonder Obama continues to believe that giving extreme deference to Muslims is a winning strategy. Unless of course he is doing it because he really is a …. Things that make you go, humm?

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Houston We Have A Problem: NASA ‘s new goals



This has to be the zaniest thing I ever heard. Really, I mean that! 
Byron York, The Washington Examiner: In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the Muslim world.”  Of those three goals, Bolden said in a recent interview with al-Jazeera, the mission to reach out to Muslims is “perhaps foremost,” because it will help Islamic nations “feel good” about their scientific accomplishments […]
Bolden made the statements during a recent trip to the Middle East.  He told al-Jazeera that in the wake of the president’s speech in Cairo last year, the American space agency is now pursuing “a new beginning of the relationship between the United States and the Muslim world.”  Then:

When I became the NASA Administrator — before I became the NASA Administrator — [Obama] charged me with three things: One was he wanted me to help re-inspire children to want to get into science and math, he wanted me to expand our international relationships, and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science, math, and engineering.
What in the sweet name of Jesus does any of this have to do with space exploration? Inspiring children and making nations feel good about themselves isn’t what put Neil Armstrong’s boots on the moon. We already throw away enough tax dollars on the Department of Education and the State Department; do we really need NASA to duplicate their roles?  

For the life of me, I certainly cannot understand the need for the extra attention to the Muslim world. The Muslim world is still oppressing women, brutalizing people who exercise free speech and cannot get control of its own religious fanatics, yet making them feel good about their ancient contributions to math and science is suppose to be a priority for our space agency? It seems pretty clear to me that the Muslim world has a few more pressing matters that need attention then their self esteem.

At first blush it would appear that Obama is completely clueless about what a space agency is for and is proving a classic example of loony left thinking, however Byron York serves up another little quote from Charles Bolden’s interview. 
Later in the interview, Bolden discussed NASA’s goal of greater international cooperation in space exploration.  He said the United States, more than 40 years after the first moon mission, cannot reach beyond earth’s orbit today without assistance from abroad:
In his message in Cairo, [Obama] talked about expanding our international outreach, expanding our international involvement.  We’re not going to go anywhere beyond low earth orbit as a single entity.  The United States can’t do it, China can’t do it — no single nation is going to go to a place like Mars alone.
Ah and there you have it, that re-occurring theme of a diminished America. Once again we have Obama putting America no longer at the forefront, but as just another member of the pack.   If Obama’s true aim is to make our space agency into an “also ran” then the goals set forth by Charles Bolden are sure to do the trick.

Below is the video of the full interview Charles Bolden gave to Al Jazeera.



Saturday, June 12, 2010

Obama to Egyptian Foreign Minister: I am a Muslim

Remember this little slip of the tongue by Obama?


It looks like it may have been more than just a simple slip of the tongue.

Pam Geller at Atlas Shrugs: Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit said he had a one-on-one meeting with Obama, in which President Obama told him that he was still a Muslim, the son of a Muslim father, the stepson of Muslim stepfather, that his half brothers in Kenya are Muslims, and that he was sympathetic towards the Muslim agenda.
Finally, during the week of 14-18th of January 2010, just on the eve of my winter tour to the US, Rachel picked up a Nile TV broadcast in which Egyptian Foreign Minister Abul Gheit said on the "Round Table Show" that he had had a one on one meeting with Obama who swore to him that he was a Moslem, the son of a Moslem father and step-son of Moslem step-father, that his half-brothers in Kenya were Moslems, and that he was loyal to the Moslem agenda. He asked that the Moslem world show patience. Obama promised that once he overcame some domestic American problems (Healthcare), that he would show the Moslem world what he would do with Israel. (more here)
This is according to Israel Today here. Here is the passage from the May 2010 issue of "Israel Today." It is on page 3 in an article titled "Obama, a 'Strategic Catastrophe,'" by Aviel Schneider:
The feeling among the Israeli public is that Obama is appeasing the Muslim world at the expense of Israel. “The American President told me in confidence that he is a Muslim,” said Egyptian Foreign MinisterAhmed Aboul Gheit on Nile TV. 
That could explain why Obama has instructed that the term “Islamic extremism” no longer be used in official government documents and statements. Furthermore, the US is now accusing Israel of harming American interests in the Middle East. General David Petraeus, the head of US Central Command, said Israel’s intransigence on resolving the conflict with the Palestinians is endangering US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. Even the US Congress considers Obama’s behavior toward Netanyahu humiliating. Three-quarters of the House of Representatives, 337 of 435 members, signed a bipartisan letter to Clinton expressing “deep concern over recent tension” between the two countries, and demanding that it be smoothed over quickly and in private.
“Obama is a real problem for Israel,” a senior official told told Yediot. “He is Israel’s biggest strategic catastrophe.” The newspaper also quoted another official who believes that for the first time Washington has switched sides. “The Obama White House is putting pressure only on Israel but does not expect anything from the Palestinians,” he said. “These American demands are unacceptable.” 
The Birthers all think that Obama is hiding his actual birth certificate because it will show he is foreign born. I think the reason is because it would clearly state that his father was a Muslim. During the election of 2008, having his father be a confirm Muslim would have been just as bad as Obama saying he himself was a Muslim.

Since our press has decided that they will not look into Obama’s history with any detail, we are all left wondering if this statement is just Obama sucking up to the Islamic world again or if he is hiding a Presidential Prayer Rug somewhere in the White House.

Given this administration’s shoddy treatment of Israel, this statement is sure to raise more than just a few eyebrows. Click over to Atlas Shrugs and read the long detail analysis by Pam Geller.

Saturday, May 15, 2010

Complete Video: The Attack On Mohammed Cartoonist Lars Vilks

Some of you have already seen the video clip where Muslim students, who were enraged by his work, attack the Swedish cartoonist Lars Vilks. Ace of Spades posted the complete video, which contains the full aftermath of the attack.

The video is about 10 minutes long, watch it all the way through. It tells so much more than the short clip of the attack.


The thing that jumps out at me the most is that these native Swedes have to be the most passive bunch of sheeples I have ever seen. Right before their eyes, these angry Muslim students trample over free speech; the hallmark of western civilization and the Swedes can’t even muster a cough of indignation. With the exception of one young lady who speaks up after the lecture is canceled, not a single one of the Swedes says boo.

Have these people been so cowered by the threat of Islamic violence they dare not defend free speech in their native land or are these sheeple so screwed up in the head with PC BS that all they notice is the offense to the Muslims?

I also cannot help think how perfectly Eric Holder would fit right in with this crowd.

What were your thoughts from the full version of the video?

Friday, June 5, 2009

My thoughts on Obama's Cairo Speech


I did not watch the speech, instead I read it. I read it for several reasons. First, I simple cannot stand the ping pong teleprompter head business going on. Second, I have to give the devil his due, Obama reads speeches wonderfully. As such, it is very easy to get caught up in the flow and miss important substance of his words.


Here is the link to the full text of the speech. Below are passages that stuck out to me that I just had to comment on. At the end I will give you my overview.


Violent extremists have exploited these tensions in a small but potent minority of Muslims. The attacks of September 11th, 2001 and the continued efforts of these extremists to engage in violence against civilians has led some in my country to view Islam as inevitably hostile not only to America and Western countries, but also to human rights. This has bred more fear and mistrust.

What about all the other stuff leading up to 9/11? The first World Trade Center attack, the bombing of the Cole, etc.? Also, many Americans have distrust because, the vast majority of the Muslim World is extremely silent over the actions of the "potent minority". How come we don't see massive protest in the Muslim World when Osama Bin Laden and Co., releases one of their tapes?


I have come here to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world; one based upon mutual interest and mutual respect; and one based upon the truth that America and Islam are not exclusive, and need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles – principles of justice and progress; tolerance and the dignity of all human beings.

I added emphasis to the last line because this one floored me. Americans and Muslims share common principles of justice and progress; tolerance and the dignity of all human beings? Sharia Law, women in Burkas and death for homosexuality doesn't quite sound like Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness to me.


Part of this conviction is rooted in my own experience. I am a Christian, but my father came from a Kenyan family that includes generations of Muslims. As a boy, I spent several years in Indonesia and heard the call of the azaan at the break of dawn and the fall of dusk. As a young man, I worked in Chicago communities where many found dignity and peace in their Muslim faith.

+

So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed. That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn't. And I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.

Where was all this pride during the election? We all knew his middle name was Hussein, but Lord have mercy if you mentioned it. Now, it is; "Hey look at me, I am Muslim too"!


But that same principle must apply to Muslim perceptions of America. Just as Muslims do not fit a crude stereotype, America is not the crude stereotype of a self-interested empire. The United States has been one of the greatest sources of progress that the world has ever known. We were born out of revolution against an empire. We were founded upon the ideal that all are created equal, and we have shed blood and struggled for centuries to give meaning to those words – within our borders, and around the world. We are shaped by every culture, drawn from every end of the Earth, and dedicated to a simple concept: E pluribus unum: "Out of many, one."

Best line so far! See Barak, you can speak highly of America! Where were these words in Europe?


.This is a difficult responsibility to embrace. For human history has often been a record of nations and tribes subjugating one another to serve their own interests. Yet in this new age, such attitudes are self-defeating. Given our interdependence, any world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will inevitably fail. So whatever we think of the past, we must not be prisoners of it. Our problems must be dealt with through partnership; progress must be shared

The end of American exceptionalism?


Let me also address the issue of Iraq. Unlike Afghanistan, Iraq was a war of choice that provoked strong differences in my country and around the world. Although I believe that the Iraqi people are ultimately better off without the tyranny of Saddam Hussein, I also believe that events in Iraq have reminded America of the need to use diplomacy and build international consensus to resolve our problems whenever possible. Indeed, we can recall the words of Thomas Jefferson, who said: "I hope that our wisdom will grow with our power, and teach us that the less we use our power the greater it will be."

This paragraph stuck out to me because I wonder what is the solution for Obama when diplomacy fails? Does he go to war only when we have international consensus? It reminds me of when Bush caught Kerry out there with his "global test" nonsense during the 2004 debates.


And finally, just as America can never tolerate violence by extremists, we must never alter our principles. 9/11 was an enormous trauma to our country. The fear and anger that it provoked was understandable, but in some cases, it led us to act contrary to our ideals. We are taking concrete actions to change course. I have unequivocally prohibited the use of torture by the United States, and I have ordered the prison at Guantanamo Bay closed by early next year.

WTF! I am just so sick and tired of all this holier than thou 20/20 hind sight bullshit! I really do wish someone would create a hypothetical attack scenario and ask him what would he do. All of these Democrats went right along with everything immediately after the attacks, it wasn't until they found it politically advantageous to knock President Bush, did they start singing a different tune. Never once did they offer a solid idea on what to do about terrorism. All they did was criticize, criticize, criticize. I guess that is why Obama is keeping so much of Bush's plans in place.


This issue has been a source of tension between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran. For many years, Iran has defined itself in part by its opposition to my country, and there is indeed a tumultuous history between us. In the middle of the Cold War, the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically-elected Iranian government. Since the Islamic Revolution, Iran has played a role in acts of hostage-taking and violence against U.S. troops and civilians. This history is well known. Rather than remain trapped in the past, I have made it clear to Iran's leaders and people that my country is prepared to move forward. The question, now, is not what Iran is against, but rather what future it wants to build.

Iran wishes to be a nuclear armed nation, they are being quite clear about that.


I understand those who protest that some countries have weapons that others do not. No single nation should pick and choose which nations hold nuclear weapons. That is why I strongly reaffirmed America's commitment to seek a world in which no nations hold nuclear weapons. And any nation – including Iran – should have the right to access peaceful nuclear power if it complies with its responsibilities under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That commitment is at the core of the Treaty, and it must be kept for all who fully abide by it. And I am hopeful that all countries in the region can share in this goal.

This is a complete pipe dream. A world without nukes? The genie is out of the bottle, so long as the knowledge exists, bombs can be made, even crude ones. As far as Iran abiding by the Non-Proliferation Treaty and using nuclear energy for power and not weapons, I don't see how that is possible. Iran wants a nuke bomb. The reasons for Iran wanting one are not the kinds things we can trade on.


I know there is debate about this issue. I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal, but I do believe that a woman who is denied an education is denied equality. And it is no coincidence that countries where women are well-educated are far more likely to be prosperous.

Chooses? Methinks not. I wonder if we will hear a peep out of Bonnie Erbe on that one?


On the speech as a whole, I got the impression that this speech served as kind of a Forgive and Forget approach to the whole last 8 years. I got this impression from the opening remarks, where he does his classic "I stand above the fray" routine when dealing with the tension between the US and the Muslim World. I further got that impression, with his end to torture and closing Gitmo bit. Even with his treatment of Afganistan and Iraq, he seems to say, we are going to close those wars and just go after the bad guys one by one.


Obama seems to gloss over some real cultural differences between America and Muslims. It is many of these cultural differences that the extremist find so offensive to Islam.


I also had a problem with the way he spoke about Democracy. He seems to act like we shove Democracy down people's throat. As the leader of the Free World, one would hope he would try to sell it better than that. Also, if you read that whole passage on Democracy, you kind of snicker when you think about how he is handling things here at home.


For a Muslim, I could see where this speech might be inspiring and positive. Especially since Obama seems to be offering a clean slate. For an American, I think this speech would have been better suited for the future, after the Muslim World have taken much more active steps in reigning in it most radical elements.

Friday, April 3, 2009

Sure Barak, you're not a Muslim!



Whiskey Tango Foxtrot! Is that the President of the United States bowing to the Saudi King? Memo to Barak: You are the Leader of the Free World, you do not have to bow to any royalty. You did not do it for the Queen, no need here, unless of course ...you ... are ... a.... Muslim?

Folks you have to see this video. Obama rushes right up and damn near cracks his back bending to the Saudi King. The word "obedient' springs to mind. Sorry the video is not in English, pay close attention when you get to the 50 second mark.



Barak Obama has been dogged by the "are you a Muslim" question for a long time now. Perhaps if he wasn't so overly accommodating to them we might not get that impression.

First we had that little slip up during the campaign, where Obama said "my Muslim faith" (rolled off the tongue pretty easy).




His first television appearance as President was to the Muslims, and not the US.




Oh and lets not forget his message to Iran. Question: How is it Obama seems incapable of knowing what is a culturally acceptable gift to the British, but he knows exactly what the Muslim holiday of Nowruz is and can give a good Muslim salutation too?



Obama would not have this issue dogging him so badly if he would show a little more American Exceptionalism now and then. He is constantly speaking of America like it is the 1930's all over again and we are somehow this crazy backwards place that is just waiting for enlighten people like him to turn it around. Plus that whole birth certificate thing doesn't help in the least bit.

Where do I stand on the "is Obama a Muslim" question? Let's put it this way, I would not be the least bit surprised if someone found a Presidential Prayer rug facing Mecca in the White House, OK!


Related Posts with Thumbnails