Showing posts with label Washington Post. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Washington Post. Show all posts

Sunday, March 28, 2010

WaPo Poll: Obama Care still sucks * - even with a skewed poll


The Washington Post has conducted a poll to test the waters for ObamaCare love. They find that only 46% like it and 50% still thinks it stinks. 
The Washington Post: Overall, 46 percent of those polled said they support the changes in the new law; 50 percent oppose them. That is virtually identical to the pre-vote split on the proposals and similar to the divide that has existed since last summer, when the country became sharply polarized over the president's most ambitious domestic initiative.
The health-care debate galvanized the country to a remarkable extent. About a quarter of all adults say they tried to contact their elected representatives in Congress about health care in recent months, including nearly half of those who say they are "angry" about the changes. In general, opponents of the measure were more than twice as likely as supporters to say they had made the effort.
This would be bad enough, but Ed Morrissey took a peek at the internals of the poll and found the Washington Post’s thumb on the scale: 
As always, the sample tells more about the poll than the results.  This poll has a D/R/I split of 34/24/38, giving Democrats a ten-point advantage in the partisan split.  That’s an increase of four points since the February survey, and far outside of reality.  Recall that Barack Obama won his presidential popular vote by seven points, with significant Republican crossover voting.  Gallup put the partisan gap at half of the span seen in this poll in the fourth quarter of last year, while Rasmussen had it at three points in its own survey just this month.
With the WaPo survey oversampling by at least five points and perhaps as much as seven, it’s not too surprising to see Obama get a 53/43 approval rating in this poll.  It should dismay Democrats to see ObamaCare still losing ground even after the Post had to amp up the partisan gap four extra points from the last survey…
Even with this much cheating, ObamaCare is still a loser.  I suspect that as ObamaCare unfolds and the bad news comes rolling out, more and more people will hate it. As more companies scale back their health care provisions and people learn about how the bill will really effect them, I suspect the cry to repeal will only grow louder.

Friday, February 19, 2010

Washington Post edits Stark’s manifesto to smear Tea Parties

Oh! What a tangled web we weave: When first we practice to deceive! Allahpundit has caught the Washington Post editing Joseph Stark’s manifesto to tie him to Tea Parties. Jonathan Capehart, shame on you my brother, writes in his editorial at the Washington Post: 
Joseph Stack was angry at the Internal Revenue Service, and he took his rage out on it by slamming his single-engine plane into the Echelon Building in Austin, Texas. We now know this thanks to the rather clear (as rants go) suicide note Stack left behind. There's no information yet on whether he was involved in any anti-government groups or whether he was a lone wolf. But after reading his 34-paragraph screed, I am struck by how his alienation is similar to that we're hearing from the extreme elements of the Tea Party movement. 
Capehart then uses carefully selected excerpts from the manifesto to prove his point. Capehart skips over the anti Bush part: 
As government agencies go, the FAA is often justifiably referred to as a tombstone agency, though they are hardly alone. The recent presidential puppet GW Bush and his cronies in their eight years certainly reinforced for all of us that this criticism rings equally true for all of the government. Nothing changes unless there is a body count (unless it is in the interest of the wealthy sows at the government trough). In a government full of hypocrites from top to bottom, life is as cheap as their lies and their self-serving laws. 
Capehart omits the anti-religion parts: 
My introduction to the real American nightmare starts back in the early ‘80s. Unfortunately after more than 16 years of school, somewhere along the line I picked up the absurd, pompous notion that I could read and understand plain English. Some friends introduced me to a group of people who were having ‘tax code’ readings and discussions. In particular, zeroed in on a section relating to the wonderful “exemptions” that make institutions like the vulgar, corrupt Catholic Church so incredibly wealthy. We carefully studied the law (with the help of some of the “best”, high-paid, experienced tax lawyers in the business), and then began to do exactly what the “big boys” were doing (except that we weren’t steeling from our congregation or lying to the government about our massive profits in the name of God). We took a great deal of care to make it all visible, following all of the rules, exactly the way the law said it was to be done. 
Capehart omits the anti-healthcare system parts: 
Why is it that a handful of thugs and plunderers can commit unthinkable atrocities (and in the case of the GM executives, for scores of years) and when it’s time for their gravy train to crash under the weight of their gluttony and overwhelming stupidity, the force of the full federal government has no difficulty coming to their aid within days if not hours? Yet at the same time, the joke we call the American medical system, including the drug and insurance companies, are murdering tens of thousands of people a year and stealing from the corpses and victims they cripple, and this country’s leaders don’t see this as important as bailing out a few of their vile, rich cronies. Yet, the political “representatives” (thieves, liars, and self-serving scumbags is far more accurate) have endless time to sit around for year after year and debate the state of the “terrible health care problem”. It’s clear they see no crisis as long as the dead people don’t get in the way of their corporate profits rolling in. 
And Capehart omits the anti-“We The People” parts:
That little lesson in patriotism cost me $40,000+, 10 years of my life, and set my retirement plans back to 0. It made me realize for the first time that I live in a country with an ideology that is based on a total and complete lie. It also made me realize, not only how naive I had been, but also the incredible stupidity of the American public; that they buy, hook, line, and sinker, the crap about their “freedom”… and that they continue to do so with eyes closed in the face of overwhelming evidence and all that keeps happening in front of them. 
Now correct me if I am wrong but aren’t so called “Teabaggers” suppose to be Bush loving, God fearing people in love with their healthcare who think We The People are smarter than our elected officials? Of course this the meme the left pushes about Tea Partiers, unless of course they want to do a hit job, then it is all about the ends justifying the means.

But Capehart’s real dishonesty is how he edits the ending of Stark’s rant:
I saw it written once that the definition of insanity is repeating the same process over and over and expecting the outcome to suddenly be different. I am finally ready to stop this insanity. Well, Mr. Big Brother IRS man, let’s try something different; take my pound of flesh and sleep well.
Joe Stack (1956-2010)
02/18/2010
The FULL closing should read as follows:
I saw it written once that the definition of insanity is repeating the same process over and over and expecting the outcome to suddenly be different. I am finally ready to stop this insanity. Well, Mr. Big Brother IRS man, let’s try something different; take my pound of flesh and sleep well.
The communist creed: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
The capitalist creed: From each according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed.
Joe Stack (1956-2010) 
Notice how Capehart omits the Communist Creed and the anti-Capitalist statement. This is intellectual dishonesty of the highest order. 

There was a time, not too long ago when brothers in high places held themselves to much higher standards. Not anymore, instead some of them would much rather do the bidding of their white liberal overlords.  Shame on you Jonathan, shame!

For further reading, Allahpundit points to Poli Pundit’s list of people Stark was mad at. You can also read Stark's FULL manifesto here.

Via: Hot Air

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

The Washington Post Is Looking For A New Pundit

The Washington Post is having a contest for America’s Next Great Pundit. While I doubt that WaPo will ultimately pick a conservative pundit, but I do think it is worth a try for anyone who isn’t a blogger or is thinking of starting a blog.

For those more established bloggers, I don’t really see a benefit. Many have already made a name for themselves in the bogosphere and have quite a following. Case in point, William Jacobson over at Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion just got his 1,000,000th hit on his blog today.

Via: Memeorandum

Via: Washington Post

H/T: Leg·gal In·ser·rec·tion

Friday, July 3, 2009

Washington Post gets caught pimpin'

This has to be the most blatant example of the MSM being in bed with the Obama administration. In a flier advertising a series of “salons” to potential johns … er lobbyist, WaPo got caught pimping administration and congress members to lobbyist for $25k – $250k. The language of the flier makes clear what they were trying to do:

via: Politico


"Underwriting Opportunity: An evening with the right people can alter the debate," says the one-page flier. "Underwrite and participate in this intimate and exclusive Washington Post Salon, an off-the-record dinner and discussion at the home of CEO and Publisher Katharine Weymouth. ... Bring your organization’s CEO or executive director literally to the table. Interact with key Obama administration and congressional leaders."


“Spirited? Yes. Confrontational? No,” it said. “The relaxed setting in the home of Katharine Weymouth assures it. What is guaranteed is a collegial evening, with Obama administration officials, Congress members, business leaders, advocacy leaders and other select minds typically on the guest list of 20 or less. …

“Offered at $25,000 per sponsor, per Salon. Maximum of two sponsors per Salon. Underwriters’ CEO or Executive Director participates in the discussion. Underwriters appreciatively acknowledged in printed invitations and at the dinner. Annual series sponsorship of 11 Salons offered at $250,000 … Hosts and Discussion Leaders ... Health-care reporting and editorial staff members of The Washington Post ... An exclusive opportunity to participate in the health-care reform debate among the select few who will actually get it done. ... A Washington Post Salon ... July 21, 2009 6:30 p.m. ...

"Washington Post Salons are extensions of The Washington Post brand of journalistic inquiry into the issues, a unique opportunity for stakeholders to hear and be heard," the flier says. "At the core is a critical topic of our day. Dinner and a volley of ideas unfold in an evening of intelligent, news-driven and off-the-record conversation. ... By bringing together those powerful few in business and policy-making who are forwarding, legislating and reporting on the issues, Washington Post Salons give life to the debate. Be at this nexus of business and policy with your underwriting of Washington Post Salons."


The Washington Post, claims that they were only bringing together leaders in Washington and that anything that came out of the salons would be on the record. Even if I could believe this, would WaPo be creating the news, simply by hosting the event and then reporting on it? To say nothing of the fact that the mix of guests could actually change the outcomes of the debates in Washington.

Robert Gibbs stated that he knew of no one in the administration who accepted the invitation and that such invitations would have to be vetted by counsel. Sorry, but I don’t buy that either. Who in their right might would host such high priced events without first securing the participation of the attendees promised in the flier? Can you imagine, WaPo collecting millions from lobbyist and when they attended the event the administration and Congress members were all no shows? Yeah, right!

I think we are going to see more of this behavior from the Obama administration and the MSM. This type of influence peddling seems like a great way for the administration to hide the lobbying, while providing cash strapped MSM with a sort of backdoor bailout.
Related Posts with Thumbnails