Showing posts with label Martha Coakley. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Martha Coakley. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Obama plans to get “combative” if Scott Brown wins



Talk about a sucker for punishment. Politico is reporting that in the even Scott Brown wipes the floor with Martha Coakley, Obama plans to take a “combative” turn: 
President Barack Obama plans a combative response if, as White House aides fear, Democrats lose Tuesday’s special Senate election in Massachusetts, close advisers say.
“This is not a moment that causes the president or anybody who works for him to express any doubt,” a senior administration official said. “It more reinforces the conviction to fight hard.”
A defeat by Martha Coakley for the seat held by the late Edward M. Kennedy would be embarrassing for the party — and potentially debilitating, since Democrats will lose their filibuster-proof, 60-vote hold on the Senate.
A potential casualty: the health care bill that was to be the crowning achievement of the president’s first year in office.
The health care backdrop has given the White House a strong incentive to strike a defiant posture, at least rhetorically, in response to what would be an undeniable embarrassment for the president and his party.
There won’t be any grand proclamation that “the era of Big Government is over” — the words President Bill Clinton uttered after Republicans won the Congress in the 1990s and he was forced to trim a once-ambitious agenda.
“The response will not be to do incremental things and try to salvage a few seats in the fall,” a presidential adviser said. “The best political route also happens to be the boldest rhetorical route, which is to go out and fight and let the chips fall where they may. We can say, ‘At least we fought for these things, and the Republicans said no.’”

Clearly Obama and his advisors are not reading the message that a Brown victory would send. While Obama and the Democrats recognize the anger of the electorate, they refuse to recognize that the anger is directed at them.


When Republicans screwed up, the electorate threw them out because they did not perform as advertised. In the case of Obama and the Democrats, the American people hold a much worse view. The American people are viewing Obama and the Democrats like a threat to the nation. This is not something that is over come by boldly pushing ahead. 

Obama and the Democrats need to view a Scott Brown victory as if the American people pushed a panic button. The people see the wild spending and the deliberate deaf ear to their displeasure over healthcare reform as a government out of control. Electing a Republican in the bluest of blue states is equivalent to jamming on the breaks.

Obama and the Democrats’ best course of action would be to chuck healthcare reform, begin taking huge chucks out of the deficit (i.e. HUNDREDS of billions in cuts), knock off the big spending and go about doing things that actually help to create jobs.  Anything short of that and the public will remain in panic mode.

Via: Politico

Monday, January 18, 2010

Is Coakley in a freefall?



Poll after poll released today all point to a Brown victory. No one has Coakley ahead of Brown. The Insider Advantage poll just released gives Brown a 9-point lead over Coakley.

From Politico:
According to the survey conducted Sunday evening, Brown leads the Democratic attorney general 52 percent to 43 percent.
"I actually think the bottom is falling out," said InsiderAdvantage CEO Matt Towery, referring to Coakley's fall in the polls over the last ten days. "I think that this candidate is in freefall. Clearly this race is imploding for her."
To really put a point on things here is what Politico has noted for the breakdown of the Insider Advantage poll. 

InsiderAdvantage's polling pool was made up of 20 percent Republicans and 43 percent of Democrats, though estimates show that independents make up just over 50 percent of all Massachusetts voters. "It'd be even worse for (Coakley) if we weighed it towards more independents," Towery said.
I am hoping that this all holds true. Brown needs to be ahead by a big number, one or two points makes traditional Democratic vote stealing games possible.

Another sign that the Coakley camp may have already called it a day is this story about no one showing up to do a phone bank for Coakley.

 Meanwhile, across the street at the Massachusetts Teachers Association, the holiday and a bitter winter storm have kept the crowds away from a phone bank for Democratic candidate Martha Coakley. As of 10:20 this morning, not a single volunteer had yet arrived for the 10am phone bank. MTA Webmaster Meg Secatore tells Watchdog.org that the severe snow and ice that have covered Massachusetts highways are keeping people from the phones.





Now this is not to say, no one did any calls for Coakley. I read at the Democratic Underground forum how several people participated in virtual phone banks (using cell phones). However, it is interesting to note that the weather kept them away from the physical phone bank. Will the bad weather predicted for tomorrow have the same effect at the polls?  Stay tuned.

Caokley’s slide in the polls is Bush’s fault?



Milking the blame Bush theme is reaching new heights. After the Obama/ Coakley rally, a few people seem to think her doing bad in the polls is Bush’s fault.

As audience members streamed out of Pres. Obama's rally on behalf of AG Martha Coakley(D) here tonight, the consensus was that the fault for Coakley's now-floundering MA SEN bid lies with one person -- George W. Bush.
"People are upset because there's so many problems," Rosemary Kverek, 70, a retired Charleston schoolteacher said as tonight's rally wrapped up. "But the problems came from the previous administration. So we're blaming poor Obama, who's working 36 hours a day ... to solve these problems that he inherited."
Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-RI), speaking with a gaggle of reporters after the event, said that while state Sen. Scott Brown (R) offers voters a quick fix, in reality, the problems created by "George Bush and his cronies" are not so easily solved.
"If you think there's magic out there and things can be turned around overnight, then you would vote for someone who could promise you that, like Scott Brown," Kennedy said. "If you don't, if you know that it takes eight years for George Bush and his cronies to put our country into this hole ... then you know we have a lot of digging to do, but some work needs to be done and this president's in the process of doing it and we need to get Marcia Coakley to help him to do that."
 Yes, it must be Bush’s fault. Coakley’s daily missteps have absolutely nothing to do with it. By the way, the article also stated that Patrick Kennedy repeatedly referred to Martha Coakley as Marcia Coakley throughout his interview with reporters. But, that too is Bush’s fault.

At some point, the left is going to have to realize that there is a limit to passing the buck. Democrats have controlled Congress since 2006 not 2009, so some of the very things they complain about comes from their own hands.

I suspect that we will be hearing the blame Bush theme all the way until 2012.

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Obama gets heckled at Coakley rally

Hat tip to Hack Wilson blog for bringing this to my attention.



I listened to the video like 10 times already and I still cannot figure out what the heckler is saying.  Listen to it and let me know what you think the heckler says. 

Either way, the Obama Coakley rally did not enjoy the same enthusiasm as Scott Brown did. I hate to rely on evidence like this, but it is looking more and more like at total Brown out in Massachusetts.

Scott Brown draws bigger crowd that Obama and Coakley



I know relying on evidence like this to determine how a campaign will do is risky, but come on. If the President of the United States cannot fill a 3,000 capacity hall in downtown Boston on a Sunday well then ….

From Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit:

A REPORT FROM THE SCOTT BROWN RALLY AT WORCESTER: “It’s an absolute mob scene. The police have closed off the streets. It’s mind blowing. The hall is already full, and it holds 3,000 people. There may be another 1,000 people outside.”


Meanwhile, reader Sean Fitzpatrick writes: “Pictures don’t do justice. Nothing like this in Mass since JFK. Worcester rally starts in thirty minutes and the streets are already packed.” Here’s a pic.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Meanwhile, reportedly, Coakley can’t fill a hall. “Martha Coakley and Barack Obama held a rally today in Boston. They couldn’t fill the hall. . . . It holds 3,000 and frankly only 2,000 to 2,500 showed up.”



Come on Massachusetts, save us from ObamaCare!

Friday, January 15, 2010

Welcome to Blunderville: DSCC uses World Trade Center image to attack Scott Brown and Wall Street greed



Lord have mercy, these folks are dense when they are in panic mode. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee put out an attack ad for Martha Coakley (D- Blunderville). The ad is supposed to tie Republican Scott Brown to those “greedy Wall Street” capitalist. So to symbolize those greedy Wall Street people, the ding-dongs at the DSCC use an image of the World Trade Center.

What were these people thinking? Why on earth would anyone use an image of one of America’s greatest tragedies to symbolize villainous greed?  The left squeals when the right accuses them of hating America, but when you see stupid shit like this, you just have to wonder if there isn’t some truth there.

What is becoming increasingly clear is that the Democrats were clearly not expecting any competition from Brown. Furthermore and more importantly, this is another example of how completely tone deaf the Democrats have become to the people they represent. Coakley and the Democrats really and truly deserve to lose in Massachusetts. The loss might finally wake them the hell up.

Via: Politico

Great Scott! Brown takes the lead in Mass Senate race



This is very happy news. A Suffolk University poll is out showing Scott Brown 4 points ahead of Martha Coakley. Brown leads Coakley 50/46.  While Brown’s lead is within the margin of error, there is other evidence that may show he really is ahead.

Byron York writes in the Washington Examiner today, that Democrats are already preparing their excuses for a Coakley loss. They are painting Coakley as another Craig Deeds in order to distance her loss from Obama and his agenda.

This is laughable. One of the very reasons why Coakley is sinking is because of her support of ObamaCare. Even the people of Massachusetts  hate it. Trying to pretend that it is just her bungling alone isn’t going to fool anyone. Should Brown really pull it out the sonic boom that will be  sent to Obama and the Democrats in Washington will be impossible to ignore.

Via: The Washington Examiner

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Martha Coakley: Another example of a Scozzafava-like meltdown



How is this for a bit of irony?  The very same Weekly Standard reporter, who Dede Scozzafava called the police on for asking questions, gets shoved to the ground by one of Martha Coakley’s goons for asking questions.

John McCormack from the Weekly Standard was once again doing what good reporters are suppose to do, ask real questions. This time he was trying to get Coakley to respond to her terrible answer on Afghanistan. McCormack has identified the guy who pushed him as Michael Meehan from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Ed Morrissey from Hot Air has more info on this guy.

This tactic employed by Meehan, reeks of the same desperation the Scozzafava campaign had when it was spinning out of control because of the Hoffman surge. Scott Brown’s surge seems to be having the same effect as the Democrats rush in all kinds of outside help to the Coakley campaign. You can almost smell the panic.

Via: Hot Air 

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Is Martha Coakley having a Scozzafava like meltdown?




Remember back to the NY-23 race when Doug Hoffman started to serious gain on über RINO Dede Scozzafava? Towards the end of her ill-fated campaign, Dede made two big mistakes that seem to spell her campaign was out of control. First there was Dede calling the cops on the Weekly Standard reporter and then there was that disaster of a press conference Dede held, with the gazillion Hoffman supporters in the background.

Today on Memeorandum, there are two stories about the Democrat candidate Martha Coakley who is running for the US Senate seat in Massachusetts.  They are stories about two of her recent blunders that seem to have the same feel as Scozzafava before her meltdown.

First, there is Martha making an ass of herself by saying there is no way to win in Afghanistan and that there are no terrorists left there.



Mind you during this debate, Martha said that gem and Scott Brown said he was running for “the people’s seat”.  Talk about out matched.

To address this oneupmanship , Martha immediately launched an attack ad against Scott Brown. However the substance of the ad is overshadowed by the fact that the ad contains a misspelling of the very state she wants to represent!




These two stories have the same bumbling feel that Scozzafava had when she was caught off guard by Hoffman’s late surge. The blog The Plum Line is reporting that the Coakley camp has sent out an “urgent” private memo to top Dem donors, claiming that their internal polling shows a "very tight" race.
Again more shades of the Scozzafava meltdown.


Could Republicans get lucky and have Coakley and the Dems complete meltdown just before the race?  Possible, we all know the Lord works in mysterious ways.

Via: The Fray

Related Posts with Thumbnails