Sunday, February 14, 2010

The Jig Is Up! Scientist admits: “No Global Warming Since 1995”!


Professor Phil Jones, who is at the heart of the Climategate scandal, has made some stunning admissions yesterday. He admits that he had trouble keeping track of the data used to produce the “hockey stick”, he admits that there has been no “statistically significant” warming in the past 15 years and biggest admission of them all, Jones admits that the Medieval Warming Period may have been warmer than today.

The last admission is the clincher. If the Medieval Warming Period was warmer than today, then the idea of man made global warming goes right out the window.

From the very start, the entire concept of man made global warming seems to have had many flaws to it. Just the fact that man made global warming was agreed upon by consensus, rather than proven through the scientific method, should have told everyone to remain skeptical.

Now we need to start asking the big questions: When will America’s mainstream media catch up to the UK on this story?  Will this administration put the breaks on spending any more money on Climate Change until the theory can be clearly proven? Finally when this bit of junk science finally collapses (and it is going to), will Climate Change frauds go to jail, and who will pay back taxpayers for the trillions wasted world wide on this sham? I am especially interested in Al Gore’s restitution!

Read the whole story and also follow the story at the Times of London.  For icing on the cake, read about the latest bit of flawed data concerning seal levels.

Via: Memeorandum
Via: Reuters

11 comments:

AllenS said...

You ask: "When will America’s mainstream media catch up to the UK on this story?"

Maybe never. Too many of them have based their reputations on this crap.

AmPowerBlog said...

American Power tracked-back with, 'Phil 'Hide the Decline' Jones Admits Faked Data'.

trinity said...

All you will hear is crickets from the MSM about this. The concept of global warming, which the liberals now call "climate change" is a load of BS. Al Gore has made a fortune off of this and a heck of a lot of others who have been beating the drum about it.

Just a conservative girl said...

This isn't going to go away easily. For too many people this is like a religon. Gore is going to hold unto this believe until he can't anymore. They will just come up with some excuse.

That being said, congress will have a much harder time using money to make sweeping changes in the law. But Gore, Obama and their ilk will continue to publically state that man made warming is fact.

Just a conservative girl said...

I hit send on the comment before I noticed that you put little ol' me on as blog of the day.

That is quite an honor. Thanks so much.

I hope you are having a fun evening and spending it with someone that you love!!!

Angie Lee said...

AGW is not even a theory but merely HYPOTHESIS. By applying scientific method, it was NEVER a theory, since evidence existed all along to prove it wrong. Regardless, theories can be and are proved false even when scientific method is applied correctly. That's what happens in science. The debate is NEVER over, unless one has switched from pursuit of knowledge to institution of dogma.

Clifton B said...

Allen S:

Welcome to ABC! You are right, much of the American media has a lot to lose if "climate change" turns out to be a fraud. Especially GE/ NBC.

Clifton B said...

Hey Don, thanks for the linkage.

Clifton B said...

trinity:

Oh there are scores of folks who stand to make a killing off of climate change. They could not care less if the nation goes broke fighting this phantom menace. Frauds, the lot of them!

Clifton B said...

JACG:

You are correct about climate change being a religion. I was reading some of the comments at the end of the articles and damn some people just refuse to believe that this is junk science.

I hope making you blog of the day brought you much traffic.

Clifton B said...

Angie Lee:

AGW was rammed though under the bogus guise of consensus. Cam you imagine how backwards we would be if all science was based on consensus?

There has always been flaws to the whole concept of AGW, but politicians rushed in to stifle debate. When this sham finally collapses, we shall learn why.

Related Posts with Thumbnails