Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Obama limits US use of nuclear weapons

This has got to be the most foolish thing I have read yet.

The New York Times: It eliminates much of the ambiguity that has deliberately existed in American nuclear policy since the opening days of the cold war. For the first time, the United States is explicitly committing not to use nuclear weapons against nonnuclear states that are in compliance with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, even if they attacked the United States with biological or chemical weapons or launched a crippling cyberattack.
Those threats, Mr. Obama argued, could be deterred with “a series of graded options,” a combination of old and new conventional weapons. “I’m going to preserve all the tools that are necessary in order to make sure that the American people are safe and secure,” he said in the interview in the Oval Office.
White House officials said the new strategy would include the option of reconsidering the use of nuclear retaliation against a biological attack, if the development of such weapons reached a level that made the United States vulnerable to a devastating strike.
Mr. Obama’s new strategy is bound to be controversial, both among conservatives who have warned against diluting the United States’ most potent deterrent and among liberals who were hoping for a blanket statement that the country would never be the first to use nuclear weapons.
This is pure foolishness. By not stating when or where we would use nukes in our old policy, the US sent a loud and clear message to the world: “Don’t even think about it”.  Obama’s new strategy does away with that message and replaces it with the word “if”.  It is the “if” that now makes attacking the US a considerable thought and that is what puts us at risk.

While I am sure Obama will renege on this policy just like he has reneged on all his other promises, rogue nations like Iran may still try to test the waters. Islamic fanatics for example believe the survival of their religion takes precedent over the survival of any Islamic state. Such thinking could easily lead to testing this crazy new policy of Obama.  


Janelle said...

Key word, crazy, indeed.

Joaquin said...

In a related story: The NYPD has announced that they will no longer use real bullets.

Unknown said...

What happened to his belief in "If they bring a knife, you bring a gun"? Does that no longer apply? Or does that only apply when dealing with the Right?

Bastiat Fan said...

It's much worse than just foolish, Clifton. It's DANGEROUS.

But you knew that, didn't you?

Keep up the great work!

Anonymous said...

So telling a bunch of suicidal lunatics that don't even care about the lives of their own self and family that we won't attack if they do is making us safer how? Telling radical militan dictators like Jon Kim Il their nuclear posturing won't invite reprisal is going to protect us how? Oh, the left really thinks if you bow and kiss their well, I won't dare say it on a family blog, that they'll enbrace us with open arms isn't just crazy or stupid. It's suicidal and last I check being suicidal is grounds to declare a man unfit for duty.

Clifton B said...


Crazy seems to be the word of the day in Washington.

Clifton B said...


Good one!

Clifton B said...


Yep that is clearly for domestic political enemies, foreign ones, not so much.

Clifton B said...

Basiat Fan:

Naively dangerous, I might add!

Clifton B said...


The Kumbaya approach to foreign affairs is a scary thing to behold!

Angie Lee said...

They all know Barry's a big wuss and that his wife wears the pants in their family, so you just know they're gonna try something.

Related Posts with Thumbnails